Audit documentation of majority of the firms reviewed did not provide a sufficient and appropriate record of the basis of the Auditor’s Report.
In some cases, the documentation did not provide evidence relating to the audit firm implementing quality control policies and procedures designed to ensure that the audits are conducted in accordance with Sri Lanka Auditing Standards.
In certain audits, the working papers lacked evidence on alternate audit procedures carried out to gather evidence regarding the inventory, when the auditor had not attended the physical inventory count.
Inadequate identification and disclosure of related party transactions, improper wordings in the opinion paragraphs, failure to address the other reporting responsibilities vested by the Companies Act No. 07 of 2007 and Finance Act No. 78 of 1988 in a finance company are some of the other salient findings from the conduct of the audit reviews.