Audit documentation of some of the files reviewed did not provide adequate evidence on performing analytical procedures at the planning stage, to identify the areas of potential risk and to corroborate conclusions formed during the audit of individual components of the financial statements and lacked any documentation of the overall audit strategy and of the audit plan.
Further, some of the deficiencies observed in the audit opinions included not modifying issues which were above the materiality level, qualifying the opinion when there was no basis for qualification, improper wording in the opinion paragraphs, not documenting basis for the qualifications of audit report and qualifying the audit opinion referring to SLFRSs when the company had adopted SLFRS for SMEs, referring to SLFRS for SMEs in the scope paragraph to the audit report instead of SLAAS.